NOT KNOWN FACTUAL STATEMENTS ABOUT HOW CASES ARE HANDLED THAT ARE NOT MENTIONED IN LAW

Not known Factual Statements About how cases are handled that are not mentioned in law

Not known Factual Statements About how cases are handled that are not mentioned in law

Blog Article

Therefore, In case the intent to cause injury is proven and it truly is further proven that inside the ordinary course of nature, that injury would lead to death, that matter is now objective plus the intention to kill (the main component that must

The mentioned case laws offer insights into how the courts interpret and use Section 302, emphasizing the importance of the fair and just legal system. It is vital for society to understand the gravity of this offense as well as need for stringent punishment to discourage probable offenders and make sure justice for that victims and their people.

four.  It's been noticed by this Court that there is actually a delay of one day while in the registration of FIR which has not been explained because of the complainant. Moreover, there is no eye-witness in the alleged occurrence as well as prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession of the petitioners has been tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram took place to be the real brothers of your deceased but they did not respond at all for the confessional statements of your petitioners and calmly noticed them leaving, 1 after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not seem much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there isn't any explanation concerning why her arrest wasn't effected after making of your alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on countless occasions that extra judicial confession of the accused is actually a weak sort of evidence which could be manoeuvred by the prosecution in almost any case where direct connecting evidence does not arrive their way. The prosecution can also be counting on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal didn't say a word concerning existence of some light with the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners jointly with a motorcycle at four.

Typically, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (including those in apparent violation of proven case regulation) for the higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, and also the case just isn't appealed, the decision will stand.

Now it is nicely-settled that considerations for pre-arrest and post-arrest bail are entirely different, therefore, inside our view the discovered Judge had fallen in error to cancel the bail allowed to petitioner because of the same Additional Sessions Judge.”

four.       It goes without saying that observations made hereinabove are only tentative in nature and strictly confined towards the disposal of immediate bail petition.

In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty for the accused who intentionally murdered the sufferer.

Extra username and password are essential for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details

nine.  Needless to mention that any observations made in the above order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.

Justia – an extensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, as well as case law at both the federal and state levels.

The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, could be the most severe form of punishment for murder website under Section 302. It will involve the execution of your convicted person as being a consequence of their crime.

Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other adequate remedy is provided by legislation." It is actually effectively-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust readily available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether These remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

                                                        

Finding reliable free case regulation sites could be challenging. Several websites demand subscriptions or offer limited information. This article helps you navigate the landscape of free case law resources in Pakistan, providing you with a curated list of reliable and accessible platforms.

Report this page